A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
Online Adult Forum 2009

Register  | Login  |   | Chat
 
Online Adult Forum Portal > Message Board > Discussion Topic: "Peace Prize Award Surprises Many, Including Recipient"
 
Username:  
Password:  
 
   
 


Thread Tools  | Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
KenVincent
Moderator
Registered: 12/19/07
Posts: 103

    10/16/09 at 06:54 AM
  #1

The Big Questions

 

1.      What is the goal of peacemaking? Why is peacemaking a Christian value?

 

2.      We tend to think of peacemaking as a global task, but where does the call to make peace apply to ordinary citizens? Are there special applications of the call for Christians? If so, what are they?

 

3.      Compromise is sometimes a tool of peacemaking, but when does it cease to be useful in making peace?

 

4.      Is it a moral obligation for Christians to take the initiative in peacemaking? Why or why not? How far should you as a Christian go to keep peace with a rude, inconsiderate or obnoxious neighbor?

 

5.      Armed force is sometimes viewed as a component of peacemaking. Do you agree that it can be? If so, how do we determine when it needs to be used for peacemaking? Are mercy and sacrifice more powerful than armed force in terms of making peace?

 


__________________
Ken Vincent
Online Forum Moderator
St. Luke Lutheran Church
Albuquerque, NM
WillHoffman
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 98

    10/16/09 at 11:47 AM
  #2

1.  I think the goal of peacemaking is to bring harmony upon peoples.  In answer to the Roman power of false Pax Romana -- forced subjugation, intimidation, and “peacekeeping” -- Jesus spoke in the Beatitudes that peacemakers will be children of God.  The history of early Christianity shows that non-violence eventually triumphs

over power and force.

   

2.  The call to peacemaking begins with us, then our families, neighbors, and strangers.  Peace involves justice, mercy, and compassion and the new covenant to embrace all peoples everywhere.  

 

3.  Compromise in peacemaking ceases when the result would appear to be a false, one-sided or enforced peace, when power takes over again.  Sometimes, a truce must be appropriate as a step towards peace.  Peacemaking also involves the principles of reconciliation, restoration and renewal.

 

4.  I think the moral obligation for Christians as peacemakers begins with ourselves, our pledge, our vow, to work towards peace.  As for taking the initiative, it begins by renouncing the use of force and power.  I think it is linked to the concept of “turning the other cheek” rather than answering tit for tit and then engaging in inevitable escalating, spiraling one-upsmanship.  Peace takes great patience, the opposite of anger.  One principle is to avoid conflict. Remember the definition of an argument:  Two people out of control, trying to control each other.  Another principle of non-violent communication is to disarm the other party with an apology, whether it is merited or not.

 

5.  I think force and power rarely work.  Remember what power does and what absolute power does.  Eventually it consumes the powerful and nothing is left except waste and loss.  Non-violence will overcome violence eventually.  I think armed force embraces all the Seven Deadly Sins: pride, wrath, greed, sloth, lust, envy, and gluttony.  I think you can apply these seven vices or weaknesses to the recent wars we have undertaken.  Think about it.

   

 

 


__________________
??: I'm still stuck on the Frontage Road of the Information Super Highway and I think I'm headed in the wrong direction -- can't seem to find the on-ramp.
Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

  Bookmarks  
Digg Diggdel.icio.us del.icio.usStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle Google